Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of SCN - time limitation - The Court then takes note of Section 28(9A)(c) and which is the principal provision which is sought to be invoked by the respondents in order to save the SCNs’ which have been impugned. Clause (c) speaks of SCN proceedings being kept pending in light of directions that may be issued by the Board. It significantly employs the phrases “similar matter”, “specific direction” and “such matter”. - The proceedings initiated against the present petitioners cannot be said to be covered under the directives of the Board. Those SCNs’ would also not fall within the ambit of Section 28(9A)(c). - SCN quashed as period of limitation expired - HC
Validity of SCN - time limitation - The Court then takes note of Section 28(9A)(c) and which is the principal provision which is sought to be invoked by the respondents in order to save the SCNs’ which have been impugned. Clause (c) speaks of SCN proceedings being kept pending in light of directions that may be issued by the Board. It significantly employs the phrases “similar matter”, “specific direction” and “such matter”. - The proceedings initiated against the present petitioners cannot be said to be covered under the directives of the Board. Those SCNs’ would also not fall within the ambit of Section 28(9A)(c). - SCN quashed as period of limitation expired - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.