Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of Invoice - In addition to these, no other record or evidence has been produced by the appellants. To substantiate their claim of not passing on the incidence of duty - The invoice issued under statutory provisions does not indicate that the incidence of duty has not been passed on. - Refund not allowed - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of Invoice - In addition to these, no other record or evidence has been produced by the appellants. To substantiate their claim of not passing on the incidence of duty - The invoice issued under statutory provisions does not indicate that the incidence of duty has not been passed on. - Refund not allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
