Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of Invoice - In addition to these, no other record or evidence has been produced by the appellants. To substantiate their claim of not passing on the incidence of duty - The invoice issued under statutory provisions does not indicate that the incidence of duty has not been passed on. - Refund not allowed - AT
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - value of the software is includable in the assessable value of hardware or not - The duty and the value are shown in the face of Invoice - In addition to these, no other record or evidence has been produced by the appellants. To substantiate their claim of not passing on the incidence of duty - The invoice issued under statutory provisions does not indicate that the incidence of duty has not been passed on. - Refund not allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.