Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Legislative competence - Constitutional Validity of amendment to Section 25 of the CVC Act and to sub-section (1) of Section 4B of the DSPE Act and to clause (d) of Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules, 1922 - extensions granted to the tenure of ED - it is nobody’s case that Parliament did not have power to enact on the subject on which the aforesaid Amendments have been enacted. As such, the said ground is not available to the petitioners. - SC
Legislative competence - Constitutional Validity of amendment to Section 25 of the CVC Act and to sub-section (1) of Section 4B of the DSPE Act and to clause (d) of Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules, 1922 - extensions granted to the tenure of ED - it is nobody’s case that Parliament did not have power to enact on the subject on which the aforesaid Amendments have been enacted. As such, the said ground is not available to the petitioners. - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.