Functional comparability governs selection of support-service and IT-enabled service comparables, with verification required for unresolved data and m...
Bank account freezing requires statutory authority; anti-money-laundering compliance and KYC monitoring do not permit unilateral indefinite restrictio...
Ex-parte order by CIT (Appeals) - Section 250(6) enjoins that the CIT(A) shall state the points for determination before it and the decision shall be rendered on such points along with reasons for decision. Thus, it is incumbent upon the CIT(A) to deal with the grounds on merits even in ex-parte order. - CIT(A) plays role of both adjudicating authority as well as appellate authority. Thus, the CIT(A) could not have shunned the appeal for non-compliance without addressing the issue on merit. - AT
Ex-parte order by CIT (Appeals) - Section 250(6) enjoins that the CIT(A) shall state the points for determination before it and the decision shall be rendered on such points along with reasons for decision. Thus, it is incumbent upon the CIT(A) to deal with the grounds on merits even in ex-parte order. - CIT(A) plays role of both adjudicating authority as well as appellate authority. Thus, the CIT(A) could not have shunned the appeal for non-compliance without addressing the issue on merit. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.