Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include a totally new ground. While the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order felt that the appellant was seeking a refund claim under section 11 B to derive a double benefit by also taking credit of the same amount - Both the ground of rejection not valid - Revenue directed to allow refund after verification of mathematical accuracy in computing the refund claim - AT
Refund of excess tax paid - The refund claim under 11B was rejected by the Original Authority on the ground that the claim cannot be modified by the appellant to include a totally new ground. While the Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order felt that the appellant was seeking a refund claim under section 11 B to derive a double benefit by also taking credit of the same amount - Both the ground of rejection not valid - Revenue directed to allow refund after verification of mathematical accuracy in computing the refund claim - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
