Penalty under Section 112 fails where knowledge, admissible statements, and incriminating evidence are not proved against the Customs Broker's directo...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4141 to 4160 of 96509 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Valuation of export goods - overvaluation - a careful reading of the orders of the lower adjudicating authorities indicate that there is mis-declaration of the value of the export goods thereby contravening the provisions of the Customs Act and Rules made thereunder. So, we cannot find fault with the orders of the original adjudicating authority in holding the goods liable for confiscation under Section 113(h), (i) and (ia) of the Customs Act, 1962 or for imposition of penalty under Section 114 (iii) of the Act ibid. - AT
Valuation of export goods - overvaluation - a careful reading of the orders of the lower adjudicating authorities indicate that there is mis-declaration of the value of the export goods thereby contravening the provisions of the Customs Act and Rules made thereunder. So, we cannot find fault with the orders of the original adjudicating authority in holding the goods liable for confiscation under Section 113(h), (i) and (ia) of the Customs Act, 1962 or for imposition of penalty under Section 114 (iii) of the Act ibid. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
