Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - Dispute relating to classification was resolved in favor appellant assessee - The tribunal found that the burden of duty had been passed on to the buyers based on the examination of the appellant's books of accounts and invoices. - Therefore, the appellant's refund claim was dismissed, as it was hit by the principles of unjust enrichment. - AT
Refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - Dispute relating to classification was resolved in favor appellant assessee - The tribunal found that the burden of duty had been passed on to the buyers based on the examination of the appellant's books of accounts and invoices. - Therefore, the appellant's refund claim was dismissed, as it was hit by the principles of unjust enrichment. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
