Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Deduction u/s. 24(a) equal to 30% - Rental income from fixture, fittings and amenities - separate agreements for let out of the property and for providing amenities - The principle of res judicata does not apply to tax proceedings, but the rule of consistency must be respected unless there are new facts. - the rule of consistency supports the claim of the assessee that the rental income from amenities must be treated as income from house property and is eligible for a deduction under section 24(a) of the Act - AT
Deduction u/s. 24(a) equal to 30% - Rental income from fixture, fittings and amenities - separate agreements for let out of the property and for providing amenities - The principle of res judicata does not apply to tax proceedings, but the rule of consistency must be respected unless there are new facts. - the rule of consistency supports the claim of the assessee that the rental income from amenities must be treated as income from house property and is eligible for a deduction under section 24(a) of the Act - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
