Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Deduction u/s. 24(a) equal to 30% - Rental income from fixture, fittings and amenities - separate agreements for let out of the property and for providing amenities - The principle of res judicata does not apply to tax proceedings, but the rule of consistency must be respected unless there are new facts. - the rule of consistency supports the claim of the assessee that the rental income from amenities must be treated as income from house property and is eligible for a deduction under section 24(a) of the Act - AT
Deduction u/s. 24(a) equal to 30% - Rental income from fixture, fittings and amenities - separate agreements for let out of the property and for providing amenities - The principle of res judicata does not apply to tax proceedings, but the rule of consistency must be respected unless there are new facts. - the rule of consistency supports the claim of the assessee that the rental income from amenities must be treated as income from house property and is eligible for a deduction under section 24(a) of the Act - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
