Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty u/s 271D - contravention of provisions of Section 269SS - Cash transaction between the Company and its Director - a. cash utilized for purchase of stamps - b. cash deposited in the bank account of the compnay by the Director - It could not be shown as to why the transactions could not be undertaken in compliance with the prescribed modes u/s 269SS. - Levy of penalty confirmed - AT
Penalty u/s 271D - contravention of provisions of Section 269SS - Cash transaction between the Company and its Director - a. cash utilized for purchase of stamps - b. cash deposited in the bank account of the compnay by the Director - It could not be shown as to why the transactions could not be undertaken in compliance with the prescribed modes u/s 269SS. - Levy of penalty confirmed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.