Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of export, they had wrongly mentioned that the export is being made for refund of IGST, wherein there was no claim for refund made - It is an admitted fact that the appellant neither claimed refund at any point of time, nor any such refund was granted to them. This fact has also been confirmed by the Revenue - Benefit of exemption allowed - AT
Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of export, they had wrongly mentioned that the export is being made for refund of IGST, wherein there was no claim for refund made - It is an admitted fact that the appellant neither claimed refund at any point of time, nor any such refund was granted to them. This fact has also been confirmed by the Revenue - Benefit of exemption allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
