Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of export, they had wrongly mentioned that the export is being made for refund of IGST, wherein there was no claim for refund made - It is an admitted fact that the appellant neither claimed refund at any point of time, nor any such refund was granted to them. This fact has also been confirmed by the Revenue - Benefit of exemption allowed - AT
Re-import of goods - Claim of exemption from customs duty - Whether the original export was under the claim of refund of IGST? - Appellant claimed that at the time of export, they had wrongly mentioned that the export is being made for refund of IGST, wherein there was no claim for refund made - It is an admitted fact that the appellant neither claimed refund at any point of time, nor any such refund was granted to them. This fact has also been confirmed by the Revenue - Benefit of exemption allowed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.