Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Offence under SEBI - person responsible for the commission of the offence - A company may have numerous Directors, however, it is apposite to state that to make each of these Directors accused persons simply by virtue of their position in the Company is not the true import of Section 27 of the SEBI Act. - There must be specific averments against the Accused Director detailing the manner in which the Director was responsible for the conduct of the business. - HC
Offence under SEBI - person responsible for the commission of the offence - A company may have numerous Directors, however, it is apposite to state that to make each of these Directors accused persons simply by virtue of their position in the Company is not the true import of Section 27 of the SEBI Act. - There must be specific averments against the Accused Director detailing the manner in which the Director was responsible for the conduct of the business. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.