Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Offence under SEBI - person responsible for the commission of the offence - A company may have numerous Directors, however, it is apposite to state that to make each of these Directors accused persons simply by virtue of their position in the Company is not the true import of Section 27 of the SEBI Act. - There must be specific averments against the Accused Director detailing the manner in which the Director was responsible for the conduct of the business. - HC
Offence under SEBI - person responsible for the commission of the offence - A company may have numerous Directors, however, it is apposite to state that to make each of these Directors accused persons simply by virtue of their position in the Company is not the true import of Section 27 of the SEBI Act. - There must be specific averments against the Accused Director detailing the manner in which the Director was responsible for the conduct of the business. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.