Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Refund of Customs Duty - unjust enrichment - In this case, the goods brought under the impugned Bills of Entry are still in use by the respondents themselves and the Director (Operations & Technical) of the respondents, has also certified the same. In that circumstances, the respondent has passed the bar of unjust enrichment as the goods are in the possession of the respondent/importer. - AT
Refund of Customs Duty - unjust enrichment - In this case, the goods brought under the impugned Bills of Entry are still in use by the respondents themselves and the Director (Operations & Technical) of the respondents, has also certified the same. In that circumstances, the respondent has passed the bar of unjust enrichment as the goods are in the possession of the respondent/importer. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
