Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Refund / Return money deposited during investigation - petitioner claims that he was forced to make a deposit under threat and coercion - Admittedly, the petitioner did not take any steps thereafter for one year. However, he sent a letter dated 12.04.2023, which was one year thereafter under legal advice - The petitioner is to respond to the said Show Cause Notice by 05.06.2023. - HC
Refund / Return money deposited during investigation - petitioner claims that he was forced to make a deposit under threat and coercion - Admittedly, the petitioner did not take any steps thereafter for one year. However, he sent a letter dated 12.04.2023, which was one year thereafter under legal advice - The petitioner is to respond to the said Show Cause Notice by 05.06.2023. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.