Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Review petition - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - petitioner/assessee was a “non-filer” - cash deposit - It cannot be said that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was invalid. This is evident upon a bare perusal of the reasons given by the AO for reopening the assessment. Thus, in our opinion, it cannot be said that the impugned notices had no basis for triggering an enquiry, and therefore, were invalid. - HC
Review petition - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - petitioner/assessee was a “non-filer” - cash deposit - It cannot be said that the notice under Section 148 of the Act was invalid. This is evident upon a bare perusal of the reasons given by the AO for reopening the assessment. Thus, in our opinion, it cannot be said that the impugned notices had no basis for triggering an enquiry, and therefore, were invalid. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
