Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Rectification u/s 154 - No doubt that the income tax authority can rectify any apparent mistake in its order however, when the order of the AO, has been upheld by the ld.CIT(A) and thereafter by the Tribunal, in that eventuality, AO is denuded from rectifying any such mistake, as it would lead to giving unbridled power to AO/ ld.CIT(A) to unsettled the settled position of fact and law and will lead to chaos and anarchy. - There cannot be two contradictory orders of the Tribunal one by upholding the assessment and other quashing the assessment based on the jurisdictional error. - orders of CIT appeals - reversed decided in favour of revenue - AT
Rectification u/s 154 - No doubt that the income tax authority can rectify any apparent mistake in its order however, when the order of the AO, has been upheld by the ld.CIT(A) and thereafter by the Tribunal, in that eventuality, AO is denuded from rectifying any such mistake, as it would lead to giving unbridled power to AO/ ld.CIT(A) to unsettled the settled position of fact and law and will lead to chaos and anarchy. - There cannot be two contradictory orders of the Tribunal one by upholding the assessment and other quashing the assessment based on the jurisdictional error. - orders of CIT appeals - reversed decided in favour of revenue - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
