Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Rectification u/s 154 - No doubt that the income tax authority can rectify any apparent mistake in its order however, when the order of the AO, has been upheld by the ld.CIT(A) and thereafter by the Tribunal, in that eventuality, AO is denuded from rectifying any such mistake, as it would lead to giving unbridled power to AO/ ld.CIT(A) to unsettled the settled position of fact and law and will lead to chaos and anarchy. - There cannot be two contradictory orders of the Tribunal one by upholding the assessment and other quashing the assessment based on the jurisdictional error. - orders of CIT appeals - reversed decided in favour of revenue - AT
Rectification u/s 154 - No doubt that the income tax authority can rectify any apparent mistake in its order however, when the order of the AO, has been upheld by the ld.CIT(A) and thereafter by the Tribunal, in that eventuality, AO is denuded from rectifying any such mistake, as it would lead to giving unbridled power to AO/ ld.CIT(A) to unsettled the settled position of fact and law and will lead to chaos and anarchy. - There cannot be two contradictory orders of the Tribunal one by upholding the assessment and other quashing the assessment based on the jurisdictional error. - orders of CIT appeals - reversed decided in favour of revenue - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
