Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Or the appeal was filed within the time - Once the appellant had indicated in ST-IV form that the order was received by the appellant only on December 21, 2018, then it was for the Department to have controverted that the order had been received by the appellant earlier to this date and an explanation for the delay should not have been expected from the appellant. - since the appeal has been filed within the period of two months from the date of receipt of order by the appellant, the appeal cannot be dismissed by the commissioner (appeals) on the ground of delay iby calculating the period from the date of order - AT
Condonation of delay in filing appeal - Or the appeal was filed within the time - Once the appellant had indicated in ST-IV form that the order was received by the appellant only on December 21, 2018, then it was for the Department to have controverted that the order had been received by the appellant earlier to this date and an explanation for the delay should not have been expected from the appellant. - since the appeal has been filed within the period of two months from the date of receipt of order by the appellant, the appeal cannot be dismissed by the commissioner (appeals) on the ground of delay iby calculating the period from the date of order - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
