Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - period of limitation of one year is mandatory or directory - the provisions are directory only - CIT directed to decided the application even after lapse of one year - HC
Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - period of limitation of one year is mandatory or directory - the provisions are directory only - CIT directed to decided the application even after lapse of one year - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.