Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent/accused - It appears that there has not been violation of this condition also. Although nothing bars the department to carry out further investigation in this regard and to justify that actually no refund of Rs. 18 crores has been made by the respondent/accused but on perusal of the record produced by the respondent/accused, which has not been disputed by the department and also in view of the averments made by the parties, this court reaches to this conclusion that there is no violation of condition no. 6 also by the respondent/accused. - DSC
Seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent/accused - It appears that there has not been violation of this condition also. Although nothing bars the department to carry out further investigation in this regard and to justify that actually no refund of Rs. 18 crores has been made by the respondent/accused but on perusal of the record produced by the respondent/accused, which has not been disputed by the department and also in view of the averments made by the parties, this court reaches to this conclusion that there is no violation of condition no. 6 also by the respondent/accused. - DSC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
