Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3341 to 3360 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Seeking restoration of striken off name of company - company was non-operational - neither any GST was paid nor revenue from operation was collected. These facts are enough to draw an inference that the company was non-operational nor doing any business. Besides this there is admission of the appellant before NCLT that in the management of the company there was deadlock due to litigation and disputes amongst the directors. - NCLT has committed no error in rejecting the appeal filed by the company under Section 252 of the Act for its restoration. - AT
Seeking restoration of striken off name of company - company was non-operational - neither any GST was paid nor revenue from operation was collected. These facts are enough to draw an inference that the company was non-operational nor doing any business. Besides this there is admission of the appellant before NCLT that in the management of the company there was deadlock due to litigation and disputes amongst the directors. - NCLT has committed no error in rejecting the appeal filed by the company under Section 252 of the Act for its restoration. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.