Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levy of penalty under the wrong provisions of the act - proposes imposition of penalty u/s 114, 114A and 114AA of the Customs Act. Order-in-original has been passed imposing penalty u/s 114A, 114AA and Section 112(a) and (b). - Adjudicating authority imposed penalty under different provisions and the appellate authority modified the same under different provisions as seen. It is not the case of wrong mention but it is a case of a conscious decision taken under which penalty has been imposed and upheld. These decisions do not advance the case of the Revenue in this regard. - AT
Levy of penalty under the wrong provisions of the act - proposes imposition of penalty u/s 114, 114A and 114AA of the Customs Act. Order-in-original has been passed imposing penalty u/s 114A, 114AA and Section 112(a) and (b). - Adjudicating authority imposed penalty under different provisions and the appellate authority modified the same under different provisions as seen. It is not the case of wrong mention but it is a case of a conscious decision taken under which penalty has been imposed and upheld. These decisions do not advance the case of the Revenue in this regard. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.