Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Penny stock transaction - It is settled law that sufficiency or adequacy of the reasons for the issuance of the notice for reopening of the assessment is not required to be gone into at this stage of the reopening. It can never be said that the final outcome of the proceedings has been derived at by the authority by issuing a notice for reopening. - if the AO was satisfied to harbour reasons to believe that there was escapement of income and if on such basis, he has exercised his powers u/s 147, 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, no fault can be found. - HC
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Penny stock transaction - It is settled law that sufficiency or adequacy of the reasons for the issuance of the notice for reopening of the assessment is not required to be gone into at this stage of the reopening. It can never be said that the final outcome of the proceedings has been derived at by the authority by issuing a notice for reopening. - if the AO was satisfied to harbour reasons to believe that there was escapement of income and if on such basis, he has exercised his powers u/s 147, 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, no fault can be found. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.