Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Rule 2(a) does not treat unassembled elevator parts as complete lifts when essential components are missing.
    Sanctioned scheme of arrangement binds creditors and bars separate suits over claims assigned under the settlement framework.
    Condonation of delay in a first appeal on facts and law granted where the appellate remedy was treated as a valuable right.
    Personal guarantor liability survives resolution plan approval and limitation objection fails in Section 95 insolvency proceedings.
    Third-party mortgage does not create financial debt without disbursement; claim can still be admitted as an other creditor.
    Preferential transaction analysis under insolvency law upheld only for the related-party creditor transfer; CoC approval was not required.
    Pre-existing dispute under insolvency law failed where the debtor had already crystallised and acknowledged the balance payable.
    Statutory first charge and deemed relinquishment shaped treatment of VAT and CST dues in liquidation.
    Simultaneous insolvency and post-liquidation settlement limits upheld, with liquidation sustained despite objections and absent resolution plans.
    Section 19 assistance under insolvency law cannot compel a former statutory auditor absent possession or proven necessity.
    Liquidation waterfall under insolvency law prevails over state tax claims, barring treatment of tax dues as secured debt.
    Inter-divisional services within the same organisation were held outside service tax, with revenue neutrality defeating the demand.
    Inter-State sales proof and assessment jurisdiction upheld; limitation, cross-examination, and penalty objections were rejected.
    Approved resolution plan extinguishes pre-CIRP income-tax dues, making later reassessment and demand notice unsustainable.
    Retraction-based commission additions and time-barred reassessment fail without corroboration, threshold compliance or verified electronic evidence.
    Section 54F exemption cannot be denied for technical non-deposit in the Capital Gain Account Scheme when house investment is otherwise complete.
    Penalty initiation requires recorded satisfaction in the assessment order; separate notice could not sustain section 271D penalty.
    Environmental charity status under section 2(15) upheld; commercial-receipt threshold and TDS did not defeat registration.
    Loan creditworthiness and related-party disallowance issues: tribunal deleted key additions, upheld CSR disallowance, and ordered limited verification...
    Search assessment overrides reassessment provisions: post-search notices under regular jurisdiction were quashed as without authority.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Seeking permission to re-export of mobile phones - case of...

Petitioner Demands Release of Mobile Phones for Re-Export After Paying Fines; Courier Company Penalties Disputed.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs May 20, 2023 Case Laws HC
Seeking permission to re-export of mobile phones - case of petitioner is that despite the payment of the redemption fine and the penalty amount, the goods have not been released for the purpose of re-export - The other co-noticees on whom the penalties have been imposed are the courier company and its employees. They are admittedly not the employees of the petitioner and he has no control over the actions of those noticees. Since the petitioner has deposited the requisite redemption fine and has deposited the penalty imposed upon him, the respondent is required to release the goods for the purpose of re-export - HC

Topics

Acts Income Tax