Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Petitioner’s DIN number was incorrectly used - grievance of the Petitioner is that owing to the identity in names, the Petitioner has been wrongly reflected as a Director in Respondent No. 2 company - The Petitioner, whose DIN number has been incorrectly used, shall be saddled with no liability in respect of Respondent No. 2 company or its subsidiaries including any of their businesses or activities - HC
Petitioner’s DIN number was incorrectly used - grievance of the Petitioner is that owing to the identity in names, the Petitioner has been wrongly reflected as a Director in Respondent No. 2 company - The Petitioner, whose DIN number has been incorrectly used, shall be saddled with no liability in respect of Respondent No. 2 company or its subsidiaries including any of their businesses or activities - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.