Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Job-work - duty liability of job-worker or supplier? - The duty liability can be shifted to the supplier of raw materials or semi-finished goods only if the supplier gives an undertaking in terms of the notification - it is noted that the learned counsel’s argument that this is a procedural lapse. It is opined that this is a substantial condition which cannot be taken as a procedural condition, as it shifts the duty liability from the job worker to the supplier of raw materials or semi-finished goods. Until and unless this condition of giving undertaking is fulfilled, the duty cannot be fastened on the supplier of raw materials or semi-finished goods, as they were not the manufacturers of marble slabs/tiles. - AT
Job-work - duty liability of job-worker or supplier? - The duty liability can be shifted to the supplier of raw materials or semi-finished goods only if the supplier gives an undertaking in terms of the notification - it is noted that the learned counsel’s argument that this is a procedural lapse. It is opined that this is a substantial condition which cannot be taken as a procedural condition, as it shifts the duty liability from the job worker to the supplier of raw materials or semi-finished goods. Until and unless this condition of giving undertaking is fulfilled, the duty cannot be fastened on the supplier of raw materials or semi-finished goods, as they were not the manufacturers of marble slabs/tiles. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.