Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 40A(3) - Payments made otherwise than by an account payee cheque - It is admitted case of assessee that to one of the parties even payments were made by RTGS/NEFT. So there is no question of lack of banking facilities available with the assessee or that when the payments were made such facility was not accessible. - When the provision of Section 40A(3) is made in the Act with specific intention to discourage colourable payments then the Ld. Tax Authorities below cannot be expected to accept such casual explanations. - AT
Addition u/s 40A(3) - Payments made otherwise than by an account payee cheque - It is admitted case of assessee that to one of the parties even payments were made by RTGS/NEFT. So there is no question of lack of banking facilities available with the assessee or that when the payments were made such facility was not accessible. - When the provision of Section 40A(3) is made in the Act with specific intention to discourage colourable payments then the Ld. Tax Authorities below cannot be expected to accept such casual explanations. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.