Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Classification of goods - product ‘alternators - General Rules for Interpretation - The ‘General Rules’ come into play only if classification and assessment of ‘excisable goods’ are involved. ‘General Rules’ cannot cloth an activity as manufacture of goods on the lines contemplated by Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. - Once the classification of ‘alternators’ has been discovered within a Chapter and it satisfies the Section/ Chapter Notes, it is not required to further look into Section/ Chapter notes of other Sections to find a probable classification elsewhere - AT
Classification of goods - product ‘alternators - General Rules for Interpretation - The ‘General Rules’ come into play only if classification and assessment of ‘excisable goods’ are involved. ‘General Rules’ cannot cloth an activity as manufacture of goods on the lines contemplated by Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944. - Once the classification of ‘alternators’ has been discovered within a Chapter and it satisfies the Section/ Chapter Notes, it is not required to further look into Section/ Chapter notes of other Sections to find a probable classification elsewhere - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.