Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) - Commissioner was of the opinion that the activity of the respondent-assessee cannot be said to be solely for imparting the education and, therefore, not entitled to the benefit/exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) - CIT(A) observed that, assessee is indulging into the profit which was found to be 67.81% without depreciation and 44.48% with depreciation - Order of HC allowed the exemption quashed - SC
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) - Commissioner was of the opinion that the activity of the respondent-assessee cannot be said to be solely for imparting the education and, therefore, not entitled to the benefit/exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) - CIT(A) observed that, assessee is indulging into the profit which was found to be 67.81% without depreciation and 44.48% with depreciation - Order of HC allowed the exemption quashed - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
