Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) - Commissioner was of the opinion that the activity of the respondent-assessee cannot be said to be solely for imparting the education and, therefore, not entitled to the benefit/exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) - CIT(A) observed that, assessee is indulging into the profit which was found to be 67.81% without depreciation and 44.48% with depreciation - Order of HC allowed the exemption quashed - SC
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi) - Commissioner was of the opinion that the activity of the respondent-assessee cannot be said to be solely for imparting the education and, therefore, not entitled to the benefit/exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) - CIT(A) observed that, assessee is indulging into the profit which was found to be 67.81% without depreciation and 44.48% with depreciation - Order of HC allowed the exemption quashed - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
