Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Claim against Official Liquidator representing company subsequent to the order of winding up - the liability on account of the property tax and water tax claimed by the respondent No. 1 to the extent rejected by the appellant OL has been a post-liquidation liability, which the OL was obliged to discharge, in view of omission in the sale notice and then, in view of the operation of Rule 338 of the Rules of 1959 - SC
Claim against Official Liquidator representing company subsequent to the order of winding up - the liability on account of the property tax and water tax claimed by the respondent No. 1 to the extent rejected by the appellant OL has been a post-liquidation liability, which the OL was obliged to discharge, in view of omission in the sale notice and then, in view of the operation of Rule 338 of the Rules of 1959 - SC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
