Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - delay in filling E-TDS - No valid reason has been given by the assessee for the delay in filling the Quarterly statements. - Assessee has claimed that no loss to revenue has been caused. However, it does not mean that assessee is allowed to skip the provision of filling the quarterly statements. - Penalty confirmed - AT
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) - delay in filling E-TDS - No valid reason has been given by the assessee for the delay in filling the Quarterly statements. - Assessee has claimed that no loss to revenue has been caused. However, it does not mean that assessee is allowed to skip the provision of filling the quarterly statements. - Penalty confirmed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.