Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Denial of ITC - R1 accepted the genuineness of transaction - R3 observed that, Input Tax Credit (ITC) had been availed allegedly, fraudulently - The mere fact that an order has been passed under Rule 86A(2) will not stand in the way of the assessing officer making an assessment or curtailing his powers in any way, in such an exercise. - Since the question of 'movement of goods' is one of the fact and the impugned order proceeds on the basis that the facts required to adjudicate this aspect were not provided by the petitioner, the impugned order is confirmed. - HC
Denial of ITC - R1 accepted the genuineness of transaction - R3 observed that, Input Tax Credit (ITC) had been availed allegedly, fraudulently - The mere fact that an order has been passed under Rule 86A(2) will not stand in the way of the assessing officer making an assessment or curtailing his powers in any way, in such an exercise. - Since the question of 'movement of goods' is one of the fact and the impugned order proceeds on the basis that the facts required to adjudicate this aspect were not provided by the petitioner, the impugned order is confirmed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.