Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Denial of ITC - R1 accepted the genuineness of transaction - R3 observed that, Input Tax Credit (ITC) had been availed allegedly, fraudulently - The mere fact that an order has been passed under Rule 86A(2) will not stand in the way of the assessing officer making an assessment or curtailing his powers in any way, in such an exercise. - Since the question of 'movement of goods' is one of the fact and the impugned order proceeds on the basis that the facts required to adjudicate this aspect were not provided by the petitioner, the impugned order is confirmed. - HC
Denial of ITC - R1 accepted the genuineness of transaction - R3 observed that, Input Tax Credit (ITC) had been availed allegedly, fraudulently - The mere fact that an order has been passed under Rule 86A(2) will not stand in the way of the assessing officer making an assessment or curtailing his powers in any way, in such an exercise. - Since the question of 'movement of goods' is one of the fact and the impugned order proceeds on the basis that the facts required to adjudicate this aspect were not provided by the petitioner, the impugned order is confirmed. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.