Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(i) - difference between the actual purchase consideration of plots of land and market value as per stamp valuation authorities - Assessee has not demonstrated before us that whether he fulfils the criteria for treating the purchase of three plots as a stock in trade of his business. Merely presumption by the assessee that those three plots were intended for further sale and therefore those were stock in trade, is not sufficient and it has to be proved by way of evidences, which the assessee has failed - AT
Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(i) - difference between the actual purchase consideration of plots of land and market value as per stamp valuation authorities - Assessee has not demonstrated before us that whether he fulfils the criteria for treating the purchase of three plots as a stock in trade of his business. Merely presumption by the assessee that those three plots were intended for further sale and therefore those were stock in trade, is not sufficient and it has to be proved by way of evidences, which the assessee has failed - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
