Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Additions u/s 69C - purview and scope of section 69C is totally different from the disallowance of expenses found to be not genuine - The basic premise with the CIT therefore for finding error in the order of the AO, that the disallowance made by him of contractors’ expense came under the purview of section 69C of the Act is found to be untenable in law. His finding of error, as a consequence whereof, that the same not being subjected to tax at a special rate provided u/s 115BBE of the Act also as a result does not survive. - AT
Additions u/s 69C - purview and scope of section 69C is totally different from the disallowance of expenses found to be not genuine - The basic premise with the CIT therefore for finding error in the order of the AO, that the disallowance made by him of contractors’ expense came under the purview of section 69C of the Act is found to be untenable in law. His finding of error, as a consequence whereof, that the same not being subjected to tax at a special rate provided u/s 115BBE of the Act also as a result does not survive. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
