Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Assessment u/s 153C - Since a response was on record, undoubtedly, the AO was required to issue a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act and then proceed further in the matter, and perhaps thereafter, frame an assessment u/s 147 read with Section 144 of the Act. This was not done. - for the AO to take recourse to Section 144 of the Act was completely uncalled. - HC
Assessment u/s 153C - Since a response was on record, undoubtedly, the AO was required to issue a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act and then proceed further in the matter, and perhaps thereafter, frame an assessment u/s 147 read with Section 144 of the Act. This was not done. - for the AO to take recourse to Section 144 of the Act was completely uncalled. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.