Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Levying penalty u/s 271D - violation of section 269SS - “reasonable cause” u/s 273B - sale of property - total consideration assessee received part by demand draft and balance amount in cash - Such technical breach due to ignorance of the relevant provision of law on account of bonafide belief coupled with the fact that the transaction in question is genuine and bonafide transaction are undertaken during the regular course of its business will not result in levy of penalty u/ 271D of the Act. - AT
Levying penalty u/s 271D - violation of section 269SS - “reasonable cause” u/s 273B - sale of property - total consideration assessee received part by demand draft and balance amount in cash - Such technical breach due to ignorance of the relevant provision of law on account of bonafide belief coupled with the fact that the transaction in question is genuine and bonafide transaction are undertaken during the regular course of its business will not result in levy of penalty u/ 271D of the Act. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
