Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
TDS u/s 194I OR 194C - External Development Charges (‘EDC’) paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority (‘HUDA’) - the Revenue does not seek to support the decision of the AO that EDC are ‘rent’ or in the nature of ‘rent’. Thus, concededly, the fundamental reasoning on which the impugned order rests is fundamentally flawed. - Petitioners in these petitions were required to deduct TDS from EDC under Section 194-I - HC
TDS u/s 194I OR 194C - External Development Charges (‘EDC’) paid to Haryana Urban Development Authority (‘HUDA’) - the Revenue does not seek to support the decision of the AO that EDC are ‘rent’ or in the nature of ‘rent’. Thus, concededly, the fundamental reasoning on which the impugned order rests is fundamentally flawed. - Petitioners in these petitions were required to deduct TDS from EDC under Section 194-I - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.