Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Capital gain computation - Exemption u/s 54 - The claim of the assessee is supported by the agreement, receipt and name appearing in the bank statement of the contractor. CIT(A) merely stated his comments and there is no controverted finding on the documents in the remand report and the contentions raised by the CIT(A) were not verified by the ld. AO nor the finding is appearing in the order of the CIT(A) that the ld. AO has commented on these documents. The assessee was not given an opportunity to refuted these allegations so made. - Claim of the assessee for an amount cannot be disbelieved - AT
Capital gain computation - Exemption u/s 54 - The claim of the assessee is supported by the agreement, receipt and name appearing in the bank statement of the contractor. CIT(A) merely stated his comments and there is no controverted finding on the documents in the remand report and the contentions raised by the CIT(A) were not verified by the ld. AO nor the finding is appearing in the order of the CIT(A) that the ld. AO has commented on these documents. The assessee was not given an opportunity to refuted these allegations so made. - Claim of the assessee for an amount cannot be disbelieved - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
