Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction u/s. 80JJAA - claim made was disallowed to the assessee because it was not included in the return of income filed by the assessee - Assessee did not have the opportunity to raise the contention before the AO as its return was processed by CPC, Bangalore and intimation was issued u/s. 143(1) and, therefore, the assessee had no opportunity to make a fresh claim by way of filing a revised return before the CPC, Bangalore since the process is completed. The claim made by the assessee at the first appellate stage is an allowable claim. - AT
Deduction u/s. 80JJAA - claim made was disallowed to the assessee because it was not included in the return of income filed by the assessee - Assessee did not have the opportunity to raise the contention before the AO as its return was processed by CPC, Bangalore and intimation was issued u/s. 143(1) and, therefore, the assessee had no opportunity to make a fresh claim by way of filing a revised return before the CPC, Bangalore since the process is completed. The claim made by the assessee at the first appellate stage is an allowable claim. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
