Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Anti-Competition Act - Cartelization - Geep Industries is very clearly in a ‘bilateral ancillary cartel’ with the Panasonic, while Panasonic is found to be member of ‘primary cartel’ in the dry cell batteries market. Thus, even though Geep is an extremely small player in the dry cell batteries market which may not be capable of influencing the market in any appreciable manner, the fact that it agrees through the PSA to follow market prices as set by Panasonic makes it clear that such behavior is anti-competitive - AT
Anti-Competition Act - Cartelization - Geep Industries is very clearly in a ‘bilateral ancillary cartel’ with the Panasonic, while Panasonic is found to be member of ‘primary cartel’ in the dry cell batteries market. Thus, even though Geep is an extremely small player in the dry cell batteries market which may not be capable of influencing the market in any appreciable manner, the fact that it agrees through the PSA to follow market prices as set by Panasonic makes it clear that such behavior is anti-competitive - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
