Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Jurisdiction of Single Member Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Monetary limit Rs.50 lakhs for hearing Appeal - In the present case, the assessee returned loss of (-) Rs.1,05 crores. AO made addition of Rs.1,06 crores and finally he determined the income of (+) Rs. 40 thousands - Only assessed income has to be looked into as stipulated in sub-section (3) of section 255 of the Act - AT
Jurisdiction of Single Member Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Monetary limit Rs.50 lakhs for hearing Appeal - In the present case, the assessee returned loss of (-) Rs.1,05 crores. AO made addition of Rs.1,06 crores and finally he determined the income of (+) Rs. 40 thousands - Only assessed income has to be looked into as stipulated in sub-section (3) of section 255 of the Act - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.