Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Levying penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non-compliance of correspondences for special audit u/s 142(2A) - AO has written a letter to the Auditor for special audit of four case including the appellants but, the AO had never issue a specific notice with point of special audit to the appellant assessee u/s 142(2A) of the Act with the Approval of the PCIT. - No penalty - AT
Levying penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) - non-compliance of correspondences for special audit u/s 142(2A) - AO has written a letter to the Auditor for special audit of four case including the appellants but, the AO had never issue a specific notice with point of special audit to the appellant assessee u/s 142(2A) of the Act with the Approval of the PCIT. - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
