Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Common facility charges being 20% paid to its holding company - mere fact that the allocation of expenses has not been made on the basis of rigid and detailed formula does not by itself make the expense disallowable under section 40A(2)(b) - AT
Common facility charges being 20% paid to its holding company - mere fact that the allocation of expenses has not been made on the basis of rigid and detailed formula does not by itself make the expense disallowable under section 40A(2)(b) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
