Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Common facility charges being 20% paid to its holding company - mere fact that the allocation of expenses has not been made on the basis of rigid and detailed formula does not by itself make the expense disallowable under section 40A(2)(b) - AT
Common facility charges being 20% paid to its holding company - mere fact that the allocation of expenses has not been made on the basis of rigid and detailed formula does not by itself make the expense disallowable under section 40A(2)(b) - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.