Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Offence u/s 276B r.w.s 278B - Whether the petitioner was actually residing in Netherland for Six years or not has to be decided at the time of trial of the complaint or at the appropriate stage which is permissible. At this stage, scope of inquiry is to ascertain as to whether the averments in the complaint are sufficient to constitute offences alleged against the petitioner or not. No interference is called for in order of issuance of process. - HC
Offence u/s 276B r.w.s 278B - Whether the petitioner was actually residing in Netherland for Six years or not has to be decided at the time of trial of the complaint or at the appropriate stage which is permissible. At this stage, scope of inquiry is to ascertain as to whether the averments in the complaint are sufficient to constitute offences alleged against the petitioner or not. No interference is called for in order of issuance of process. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
